The Prime Minister has come under scrutiny after describing 26 arrests at the Unite the Kingdom protest in London as evidence of ‘serious disorder’, while national media outlets characterised more than 500 arrests at the 2025 Notting Hill Carnival as less serious and part of a ‘vibrant cultural day’.
Arrests at Unite the Kingdom
Metropolitan Police confirmed 24 arrests and 26 officers injured at the 13 September 2025 protest (Guardian, Independent, Reuters). Police estimated the rally drew around 110,000 people.

However, many attendees and commentators dispute that figure, claiming that drone footage and eyewitness accounts suggest the true number ran into the millions. The event’s livestream on X attracted nearly 2.8 million viewers, dwarfing the estimated 9,000 who tuned in to traditional news channels’ coverage, highlighting a shift in where the public is choosing to see events for themselves.

The Prime Minister later described the protest as being about “racism” (Keir Starmer, X). Yet organisers and participants said the demonstration was directed against his government’s policies on illegal immigration and restrictions on free speech. Large sections of the crowd chanted for him to resign, while people of colour appeared on stage as speakers and performers, challenging claims that the event was about race.

Carnival Arrests Framed Differently
Over the two days of this year’s Notting Hill Carnival, more than 500 people were arrested for offences including drug possession and serious assaults (Yahoo News UK). Despite this, coverage across the BBC, the Guardian, the Independent and Reuters prominently described the carnival as a “celebration of culture” and a “vibrant day”.
What the 528 Notting Hill Carnival Arrests Were For
| Offence | Number of Arrests |
|---|---|
| Drug offences overall | 167 |
| Possession of an offensive weapon | 50 |
| Sexual offences | 21 |
| Violence with injury | 4 |
| Other violence | 49 |
| Assaults on police officers | 55 |
| Other offences (miscellaneous) | Remaining portion of total (unspecified in detail) |

Comparison with Pro-Palestine Marches
Since October 2023, pro-Palestine marches have seen far higher numbers of arrests. On 7 September 2025, police detained almost 900 people in London — 857 under the Terrorism Act for supporting a proscribed organisation, and 33 for other offences including assaults and public order breaches (Reuters).
While some commentators claim total arrests from such demonstrations exceed 2,200 since October 2023, an aggregated figure has not been published by the Met or the Home Office.

Arrest Figures Side by Side
| Event | Date(s) | Estimated Attendance / Reach | Arrests | Notes / Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Palestine marches (since Oct 2023) | Multiple | Varies | 2,200+ (claimed, not independently verified) | Aggregate not published |
| Pro-Palestine protest | 7 Sept 2025 | Not confirmed | 890 | Reuters |
| Notting Hill Carnival | Aug 2025 (two days) | ≈ 2 million attendees | 500+ | Yahoo News UK |
| Unite the Kingdom protest | 13 Sept 2025 | 110,000 (police estimate); “millions” claimed by attendees; 2.8m livestream viewers on X | 24–25 | Guardian, Reuters |
| Unite the Kingdom protest | 27 Jul 2024 | Not available | 9 (claimed, not independently verified) | Met records not published |
| Unite the Kingdom protest | 26 Oct 2024 | Not available | 4 (claimed, not independently verified) | Met records not published |
Critics Warn of Double Standards
Observers argue that the disparity in framing raises serious concerns. Arrests at protests are highlighted by ministers as proof of violent disorder, while larger numbers at cultural events are often downplayed.
Critics say the sharp contrast between legacy media audiences of around 9,000 and 2.8 million people watching the protest live on X makes selective reporting even more damaging. The public can now directly compare official narratives with raw footage, creating a widening gap in trust.

Analysts warn that such selective presentation:
-
risks eroding public trust in both government and media institutions,
-
fuels perceptions of bias across communities, and
-
leaves policing caught between enforcement and the political fallout of how their operations are reported.

Some commentators suggest the government and sections of the media are, intentionally or otherwise, fuelling division by applying double standards. As one critic noted, “If 500 arrests can be part of a ‘vibrant day’, then 26 should not be inflated into a national crisis.”
The British public, they add, “deserve levelled reporting from both sides. As journalists, we have a responsibility to tell the truth.”




